Thursday, August 14, 2003
By Michael Peltier
TALLAHASSEE — After months of political wrangling, Southwest
Florida lawmakers said a sweeping measure adopted Wednesday
to stabilize the medical malpractice insurance market is a
significant step forward — if not the final one.
The House passed the bill 87-26 after the Senate earlier voted
32-4 for the measure.
Following hours of debate in both the chambers Wednesday, local
lawmakers joined their colleagues in sending to Gov. Jeb Bush
the reform package they hope will stem skyrocketing insurance
premiums.
That said, they agree there is likely much more to do.
"The bill you have in front of you today is a compromise
package, a balanced package that is a good starting point to
make sure that we continue to do what you need to do," Rep.
Carole Green, R-Fort Myers, told members in debate. "What
we need to do is to make sure we have quality health care available.
"It is a starting point in the right direction so that
we can go home to our constituents and say, yes, we do share
your concern about access to care," Green said.
The compromise plan caps damages for pain and suffering and
other noneconomic penalties at $500,000 per physician and calls
for an immediate freeze on skyrocketing insurance rates that
physicians say are forcing many to limit their practices or
go out of business.
The bill also creates liability caps for health-care centers
and emergency rooms. Victims would be able to collect up to
$2.5 million in noneconomic damages for the most egregious
cases.
"In (homeland) security, we had to balance the issues
of our civil liberties versus our need for security," said
Rep. Dudley Goodlette, R-Naples, and a key House negotiator. "In
this issue, we're balancing the access to quality health care
in this state with the access to the courts."
Rep. Mike Davis, R-Naples, was among those who said that lawmakers
have taken a significant first step in dealing with the issue.
But, like many of his colleagues, Davis said he expects to
return to modify the program as the effects of legislation
become known.
"
I've heard a lot of talk between my colleagues today that they
are going to vote for it today, as I am going to, with the
thought in mind that we are going to get some more cracks at
this thing," Davis said.
In the Senate, Sen. Dave Aronberg, D-Greenacres, was among
a handful of Democrats to vote in favor of the bill.
While saying it may not provide the immediate relief called
for by physicians, Aronberg, whose cross-state district includes
south Lee County, said it would bolster long-term stability
in the insurance market.
"We've had three special sessions and the people at home
are growing tired of our gridlock on this issue," Aronberg
said. "We needed to pass a bill. When a compromise was
reached, though the compromise was far from perfect, we needed
to get something done."
That said, Sen. Burt Saunders, R-Naples, echoed others in
saying that the legislation should allow insurance companies
more accurately to predict their losses. That should result
in lower rates for doctors. If it doesn't, further action may
be necessary, he said.
"
Clearly, this is a crisis that has to come to an end," Saunders
said. "If this doesn't do it, we'll be right back here
to try to figure out how to do it. It will be much more drastic."
But people on both sides of the debate have already criticized
the measure.
The doctors who the bill was intended to help have said they
don't support it and insurance companies say it likely won't
lower rates.
Sandy Mortham, chief executive officer of the Florida Medical
Association, said doctors were disappointed because they wanted
a $250,000 hard cap with no variations.
"There are a lot of different parameters that open that
cap up," Mortham said.
However, she did praise one part of the bill — a $150,000
cap on noneconomic damages for claims against emergency rooms.
Malpractice victims are also unhappy, saying the bill unfairly
limits how much they can collect. Limits on damages make it
less likely lawyers will take expensive cases, meaning access
to justice is denied, they say.
Neal Roth, a malpractice attorney and one of the trial bar's
chief lobbyists working against caps, said he was most disappointed
that a decision was reached without data on the number of frivolous
lawsuits in the state, whether any emergency rooms have closed
because of high rates and other issues.
"When it got done wasn't as important to us as much as
all the data being collected ... so we could get to the truth
behind all the issues," Roth said.
Even lawmakers who supported the bill didn't sound completely
satisfied.
"Is this the bill that I would like personally to have?" asked
Allan Bense, a Panama City Republican and a key negotiator
on the issue. "No."
Democrats, meanwhile, criticized the bill because it doesn't
include a provision forcing insurance companies to automatically
reduce premiums. Instead, it freezes rates until January.
"Folks, this is the major crisis, this is the issue — it's
the amount of insurance premiums that doctors are paying," said
Sen. Skip Campbell, D-Fort Lauderdale, in arguing for a rate
rollback.
But Sen. Tom Lee said the rate freeze will help doctors.
"Don't anyone in this chamber think that a rate freeze
is something to sneeze at," said Lee, R-Brandon. "Rates
have been going up in this state over the last three years
at double digit rates — 25 percent or above. A rate freeze
is significant. That is a substantial accomplishment for this
Legislature."
Rep. Dan Gelber, D-Miami Beach, argued that the legislation
froze rates for only a few months.
"We really shouldn't call it a freeze," he said. "Maybe
a chill, maybe a breeze, but not a freeze."
The House rejected an amendment filed by Gelber that would
have rolled back doctors' insurance rates 30 percent in two
years.
Florida is just one battlefield in a nationwide war over how
much should be paid for doctors' mistakes.
In Washington, the U.S. Senate killed legislation that would
have limited the ability of malpractice victims to win some
types of damages to $250,000 — a ceiling sought by President
Bush.
Find
a Medical Malpractice Lawyer
|