How is the date of discovery defined in a medical malpractice case?

Get Your Case Reviewed by a Medical Malpractice Attorney
Enter Your Zip Code to Connect with a Lawyer Serving Your Area
searchbox small

Question:

I had a couple of mammograms over a two-year period and my doctor at the time assured me that the results from each mammogram showed no cancer. Last week, results from a recent mammogram indicated a tumor in my breast that has now mestasized into my lymph nodes. My current doctor ordered my former reports and informed me that the results indicated a growing malignancy that should have been apparent to my first doctor. I will now have to undergo rigorous cancer therapy with exorbitant costs I might have avoided if my first doctor had read the results correctly. I am considering bringing a medical malpractice suit and want to know my chances.

Answer:

This is an apparent case of medical malpractice and you should definitely consult an attorney. However, one possible barrier to your suit might be your state's statute of limitations laws. Many of these laws are premised on the time the injury was discovered, and how this discovery date is defined varies from state to state. Some state laws are pro plaintiff, and set the discovery date at the time the injury is actually discovered or should have reasonably been discovered; in this case the discovery occurred when your reports were correctly read. This is called the "delayed discovery" doctrine. However, some states have more stringent laws and set the date of discovery at the origination of the medical malpractice. If your state's laws say that the date of discovery dates back to that first misread report, the statute of limitations may have already run. Consult with an attorney experienced with medical malpractice to determine your rights in this case.

Please Log in to answer questions.

Get Professional Legal Help



Get Informed - Medical Malpractice Laws & Information

LA-WS4:0.9.17.120208.12696+